Zero engineering cycles, 59% conversion lift

In under three months, StartEngine, one of the largest private consumer investing companies in the world, moved from engineering bottlenecks to weekly experimentation cycles. Result: 59% homepage conversion lift and 42% lift on their primary invest page, with zero engineering cycles required and full compliance maintained.

‍

Context: Design and testing velocity constrained by engineering capacity

The company had ambitious growth goals. Kevin O'Leary (aka Mr. Wonderful) as a spokesman and strategic advisor. Sophisticated marketing team with lots of ideas in their heads and in Figma. But shipping tests meant pulling engineering resources from product work. In a regulated industry with compliance requirements, every change needed review and careful implementation. Design iterations that should have taken days were taking weeks or months.

They needed a way to test rapidly, implement complete page redesigns, and maintain compliance standards without touching engineering resources.

‍

Conviction: End-to-end implementation = strategic velocity

When you remove engineering as a bottleneck, experimentation becomes strategic. You can test complete redesigns, not just button colors. You can validate major hypotheses, not just incremental improvements. And you can do it all while maintaining compliance in a regulated environment.

What that looks like operationally:

→ Complete page redesigns shipped in days, not quarters.

→ Mix of AI-generated concepts and client Figma implementations.

→ Compliance review built into the approval workflow.

→ No engineering tickets, no deployment cycles, no technical debt.

‍

The Coframe workflow: design → approve → ship → learn

1. Generate options (or implement designs)
Coframe created complete page redesigns from scratch AND implemented client Figma files within days. Every variant maintained brand standards and compliance requirements for the regulated investing space.

2. Compliance in the loop
All variants went through proper compliance and legal review before launch. The workflow accommodated regulatory requirements without slowing velocity.

3. Test strategically
Not just optimization. Testing major strategic hypotheses: Does social proof from notable investors matter? Does urgency messaging drive action? Do complete redesigns outperform incremental changes?

4. Ship without engineering
Changes went live immediately after approval. No engineering involvement. No deployment dependencies. No technical blockers.

Think of it as having an engineering team dedicated to growth, but without hiring or managing one.

‍

What changed on the site

Major strategic tests across multiple surfaces:

→ Homepage complete redesign: Tested entirely new layouts, hero sections, value props. 59% conversion lift on winning variant.

→ Invest page transformation: Added countdown timers, restructured content, emphasized urgency. Initial "countdown" variant showed +29% lift within days, scaling to 42% confirmed lift.

→ Campaign messaging: "Healthy Reset Sale" beat "Back-to-School" in head-to-head testing (this was for another client, but similar strategic approach).

→ Offering page optimization: Tested notable investor callouts, momentum indicators, funding badges. Mobile carousel with sticky CTA showing 4% lift.

→ Checkout flow experiments: Tripled highest investment amount options. Tested across multiple offerings simultaneously.

→ Strategic hypothesis validation: Do investor credentials drive action? Does urgency work in this category? Is social proof important? And the list goes on.

‍

Proof: strategic testing at tactical speed

→ 59%+ homepage conversion lift within four months of testing.

→ 42% lift on primary invest page within three weeks of initial test.

→ Multiple complete page redesigns shipped and tested in under 4 months, in addition to many smaller tests.

→ Zero engineering cycles required throughout entire program.

→ Full compliance maintained in regulated consumer investing space.

→ Figma to live in hours, not weeks or months.

The strategic advantage: when engineering isn't a constraint, you can test hypotheses that would otherwise sit in the backlog for quarters.

‍

Why Coframe fit the operation

→ No engineering required. Complete independence from product development cycles.

→ Flexible input: Generate new concepts OR implement client Figma designs.

→ Compliance-friendly workflow. Built-in approval gates for regulated industries.

→ Complete redesign capability. Not limited to small tweaks or variant testing.

→ Strategic partnership. Both Coframe ideas and execution of client concepts.

→ Speed without sacrifice. Days from major home page redesign to live, with quality maintained.

‍

Close

Engineering capacity shouldn't limit growth experimentation. Coframe made it possible to test complete redesigns, validate strategic hypotheses, and ship major changes in days while maintaining compliance standards. That's how zero engineering cycles generated 59% homepage conversion lift and built a repeatable system for continuous strategic testing.